Does ICAN Actually Help the Health Freedom Movement?
The Bigtree team of ICAN has blood on their hands and cash in their pockets! All of the people involved in ICAN have direct links to big pHarma.
The Bigtree team of ICAN has blood on their hands and cash in their pockets! All of the people involved in ICAN have direct links to big pHarma.
The story has it that Andrew Wakefield ran across Tia Severino in West Hollywood California when she was working the circuit trying to gain Fame being an actress and singer. She is a public figure working the grift for the nonprofits and charity puppeteers! The cult runs deep my friends. Dig deep on this woman and you will find out that little is what It seems with this group of misfits actors and actresses?
The virus lie has been going on for a very long time. Since the early 1900’s and earlier there have been books and writings about the dangers of jabs and the false narrative of “viruses” and “contagions”. You can also read this great page on how only the vaccinated died in 1918, during the “Spanish Flu” pandemic.
The virus lie promoters like Del Bigtree and his group of friends “monetize misery” by spreading lies and deception and skirting away from truth. If they would only tell the truth that THERE ARE NO VIRUSES, they would all be out of a job and probably be back to their original gigs filming adult movies and exploiting another sect.
The following is written by Danni Eron Fuller who has been documenting adverse events from jabs.
The archive is getting bigger and bigger. This is almost everything I have on what really created the tuberculosis epidemic in the past.
Describes it all with more in my article on substack:
https://zignack.substack.com/p/tetanus-lockjaw
Also shows how the only common denominator are jabs, that they never prove that the bacteria or the byproduct of the bacteria is the cause, but health authorities and doctors keep coming up with all kinds of other excuses for why the children got tuberculosis:
They scratched the wound. The wound would not heal.
There are bacteria in the air so parents should just relax and wait for it to rain then the mass murder of children would stop .
It was an unclean vaccine.
They were playing ignorant too so some think it was a mystery that all the children died of tuberculosis after jabs.
Even though it was measles jabs, diphtheria and typhoid jabs, they still claimed that there must have been traces of the other bacteria that they claim is the cause of tuberculosis. But without scientific proof.
They tested the jabs for the tuberculosis bacteria to deny that it was the vaccines, despite never proving that the bacteria caused tuberculosis.
They claimed that it was the children who got wounds after playing with toy guns. But those kids who were not jabbed continued to play with toy guns
But again – the only common denominator for all of them. School children, teachers and Soldiers were all jabbed.
When you just continue to play ignorant and claim that the bacteria is the cause, you can make a tetanus jab for the people too. Then everything will be alright again
Written by Daniel Alexander Zeck
March 9, 2023
(Facebook post)
Del Bigtree today. Wow.
To think that the no virus position is synonymous with allowing any of the bad actors to get off scot-free is absurd. What a poor misrepresentation of our position. We are trying to hold the majority of the allopathic system accountable, because much of it is built on the fraudulent pseudoscience of viroLIEgy.
No proof of virus would render any argument regarding the necessity or legitimacy of any of the measures totally ineffective, which would then potentially turn the hospital protocols, the shots, etc. intro an act of genocide rather than “we genuinely wanted to help, but we miscalculated some things and underestimated the harmful effects of the shot.”
Sure, a “gain of function virus” would possibly serve to incriminate *some* of these actors. That is, if we’re assuming the system will legitimately hold any of these people accountable (refer to all of the people who were involved with Ghislaine Maxwell and how she was the only one “held accountable”).
But what does gain of function serve in the long run, Del?
For this, read the excerpts from my recent article, An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree: https://aleczeck.substack.com/…/an-open-letter-to…:
“I want you both to think for a moment: within the context of germ hypothesis, which of the two has scarier implications for the future?: lab-made viruses funded by people with perceived nefarious intentions, shrouded in uncertainty and mystery, with greater lethal potential than their natural counterparts, or the one-in-gazillion chance natural virus that jumps from a bat to a pangolin to a human (is the pangolin still part of the story?) that rarely occurs across species? Again, neither of these are true whatsoever— both are completely unproven fantasies that make for great science-fiction movies. I believe “they” (whoever they are) are allowing gain of function to be discussed more frequently in mainstream conversations, and of course amongst the surface level alternative crowds where they’re carried by pseudo-celebrity alternative talking heads, to feint a controlled leak of the (completely false) “truth.” And all of the alternative talking heads and their followers shouted “see! Now the truth is out! The virus was made in a lab. Alas, we’ve solved the mystery of COVID.”
But have we? Or are we just setting ourselves up for this nonsense to continue Ad Infinitum? And this time it’s even worse: it’s being paraded around by the 3-year-censored alternative pundits. And as the mainstream position continues to lose its popularity with the controlled demolition of the death-cult, pharmaceutical backed narrative, the alternative talking heads will rise in popularity, and those who’ve not resolved their consciousness of blindly outsourcing to anyone, regardless of whether they’re alternative or mainstream, will take the future bait hook-line-and-sinker.”
Erin Olszewski’s admission of receiving psychological operations training in Oregon has raised questions about her controversial associations and the use of donation funds in her various non-profit ventures.
In Oregon, Erin Olszewski stated she received psychological operations training at Fort Bragg.
It is the first time she admitted this fact publicly.
She focused on her “undercover nurse” stint in New York.
However, many do not know she worked intimately with Scientology’s DC lobbyist, Greg Mitchell and Lincoln Project’s Jonathan Lockwood.
Between 2018 through 2020, Olszewski created multiple non-profits as documented on this channel and elsewhere. For example, she abandoned Florida Freedom Alliance in 2019 within three months of it forming.
Finally, Kevin Tuttle assisted Erin Olszewski to orchestrate protests and the creation of multiple non-profit companies.
Kevin Tuttle is a “former” Air Force Public Affairs officer, also training at Fort Bragg. He also created a shell non-profit supposedly to help parents of vaccine-injured children.
Where did the collected money go? How’s that for a psyop?
The cultivation of moles and the establishment of influence operations is a disturbing subject, and the case of Heather Simpson exemplifies how her rapid ascent as an influencer is not an anomaly.
The case of Heather Simpson is noteworthy because her quick rise as an influencer is not a statistical outlier.
Force Officer Kevin Tuttle established a pattern of cultivating questionable assets like Lynette Marie Barron for Del Bigtree and vaccine patent holder Doctor Paul Offit.
It is speculated by many that Del Bigtree and Paul Offit provided the financial means for Lynette Marie Barron to travel from state-to-state to solidify her role as a legitimate activist.
Much like Heather Simpson, media organizations provided Barron an opportunity to become a public figure and a voice representing the health freedom movement.
With the assistance of Kevin Tuttle, Barron’s role as an activist would be particularly valuable in this respect, providing her sponsors with insights into operations, funding sources, and high-level decision-making.
Watch this video for yourself to see if you can decode the meaning behind Rush’s symbolic album covers.
Who exactly is Barbara Loe Fisher? Currently, she performs a pivotal role in the administration of the National Vaccine Information Center. However, grasping her backstory necessitates revisiting 1984 and witnessing her navigation through contentious public health landscapes.
Barbara Loe Fisher’s image often belies both her claims about herself and certain public perceptions towards her. Alongside Jeff Schwartz—also notable for his advocacy work—they are responsible for successfully pushing forward the National Vaccine Injury Compensation program in 1986. United under their collective D.T.P (Dissatisfied Parents Together), they championed safer immunizations while emphatically proclaiming their support for vaccine initiatives overall.
The ripple effects of their involvement with Congress were extensive and far-reaching, predicated on an awareness of both their objectives and potential consequences, many might argue these extended beyond those negatively impacted by vaccines. Notably controversial was Schwartz’s claimed personal tragedy—a daughter lost to adverse DPT vaccine reactions.
However, this narrative has not held up against scrutiny; persistent questioning unveiled that Jeff Schwartz did not lose a daughter due to declining health after receiving the DPT vaccine; public records confirmed he has only one child, a son—a fact contrary to his previous assertions around experiencing firsthand the devastation wrought by compromised vaccines.
Why would someone lie about something like this you ask? It is a very easy task when you follow the money.
Jeff Schwartz, renowned for his work in law and politics, was instrumental in drafting the indemnification legislation to safeguard vaccine manufacturers during the 1976 swine flu outbreak under Democratic oversight led by Rogers. Following a period of relative silence, he unexpectedly partnered with prominent advocate Barbara Loe Fisher to concoct further legislation intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from an escalating number of lawsuits connected to polio and DPT vaccines.
His testimony to congress stated this “Despite our own experiences, we are not an anti-vaccine group. Our three major goals are simple. We seek to prevent other children and families from suffering the catastrophes that have befallen us. We are proud to join with a number of medical, nursing, provider, public health, consumer, and other groups in supporting this bill. For this bill would do what no other bill that has been discussed would do.”
If you read a multitude of newspaper excerpts and you will find that Barbara Loe Fisher, author of “A Shot in the Dark”, sourced 90% of her referenced materials from Marge Grant. During congressional hearings and subsequent press releases, Fisher unequivocally stated that her daughter was a victim of an adverse reaction to the DPT vaccine. However, she refrained from being branded as anti-vaccine.
As echoed in earlier statements, Jeff Schwartz held similar positions as Fisher. Both personalities were keen on establishing an exclusive redressal approach for vaccine-related injuries through non-jury courts.
The actions of both Schwartz and Fisher have been criticized for not inherently serving children’s best interests. Despite this criticism, they both continued to advocate at legislative levels on behalf of organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics – evident through their respective testimonies given during congressional hearings.
Both Schwartz and Fisher were instrumental contributors towards developing the Vaccine Injury Table; lobbying tirelessly until its adoption within legislation became a reality – much to their elation upon receiving news surrounding its passing into law.
However, enthusiasm soon soured when intricacies unfurled post-implementation led to unsatisfactory results prompting Ms.Fisher to take issue with governmental bureaucracy supposedly shifting regulations ad hoc – all while ignoring her active participation throughout discussions between Paula Hawkins and Senator Waxman.
Prior to the passing of the legislation, Phil Donahue did a show revolving around the DPT controversy. A guest on his show was Marge Grant, who spearheaded an initiative soliciting personal stories related to the issue at hand. Regrettably, she did not receive these letters, due to intervention by Barbara Loe Fisher and Jeff Schwartz, who obtained them unlawfully; urging Ms. Grant to secure legal representation for their return.
Fisher is alleged to have used sourced documents from this same individual as foundational material for her book ‘A Shot In The Dark’. Their involvement subsequently led towards shaping what many believe now categorize as a contentious creation that has resulted in lingering challenges society faces today.
Post-legislation approval saw Fisher garnering nominations for membership on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices board until 1992. Her research contributions extended overseas where she participated in a decade-long UK study investigating potential long-term impacts of DPT vaccines on brain-injured children (a 10-year study) – systematically assessing possibilities like learning disabilities and other health complications associated with these vaccinations.
The research under discussion is known as the “National Childhood Encephalopathy Study”. Its primary objective was to consider including reissued seizure disorder in the vaccine table, which saw a substantial number of claims made from the federal government’s dedicated vaccine fund.
Barbara Loe Fisher, however, cast her dissenting opinion against this move due to insufficient evidence advocating such action. Consequently, her stance substantially contributed to the exclusion of residual Seizure disorder from revisions on the vaccine injury list causing numerous individuals to lose compensatory avenues for their injuries.
Marge Grant also played a role in this study and detailed her insights about Barbara Loe Fisher in her book titled “A Stolen Life.” By 1992, Fisher had vacated this field and transitioned into leading roles at the National Vaccine Information Center.
To elaborate further on Fisher’s background; she has not publicly spoken about any personal connection or experiences related to these circumstances such as an injured daughter nor revealed that she actively offered contributions towards drafting legislation – which she openly criticizes today. Another significant detail kept out of public knowledge is that Federal funds facilitate running aspects of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System) database under Fisher’s management.
During the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth trial held at the United States Supreme Court, an Amicus curiae brief was written in favor of Bruesewitz by an anonymous author, which gained prominence for its noteworthy commentary. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) was distinctly referred to as an “Adjunct” or subsidiary body resulting from the Act of 1986.
The term “adjunct” is conventionally utilized when a law spawns auxiliary entities and it implies that something is not fundamental but rather complementary to a primary integration. In this context, Barbara Loe Fisher – founder of NVIC – appears to have reaped numerous benefits post-implementation of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in 1986. Going by dictionary denotations, being termed as ‘adjunct’ suggests her association with NVIC operates on support accrued from this Act while delivering additional reinforcement.
Moreover, there’s a constant undercurrent suggesting Fisher discreetly manipulates information output whilst toeing the line; only disclosing sufficient data without crossing limits set forth by controlling entities. A question hence arises about her affiliations amidst varied government bodies – are these collaborations furthering her cause positively?
As far as improvements since NVIC’s inception are concerned, tangible changes require scrutiny and any incremental progress should ideally be assessed over time.
Conclusively noting Barbara Loe Fisher’s stance – she openly advocates not against vaccines per se but emphatically voices support towards safer vaccine protocols instead. Why is he dallying with all these different government agencies? What significant changes have been made since the National Vaccine information center went live?
It is imperative to recognize that those claiming to be pro-safe vaccine, rather than anti-vaccine, are indeed controlled opposition. This seemingly benign stance promotes the false notion that progressive steps are being taken. A case in point involves Barbara Loe Fisher, who not only participated in contriving pertinent legislation but also had an active role within ACIP when it controversially eliminated a condition evidently arising from vaccinations.
Subsequently assuming a position at the National Vaccine Center, Fisher now behaves as if she wasn’t personally affected – her daughter isn’t injured due to vaccines. It contradicts earlier claims portrayed vividly across various media platforms pre-legislation about her child’s severe injury caused by vaccination; nowadays such incidents rarely bear mentioning.
By perusing these archived newspaper articles and assessing other corroborative evidence carefully, it becomes increasingly evident that Barbara Loe Fisher is NOT who she say she is.
The Ohio Freedom Keepers’ Instagram post and the connection to “The Informed Mama” and Denise Aguilar suggest there could be further significant associations to uncover.
The Ohio Freedom Keepers’ recent Instagram post, along with the emergence of the 50.63.202[.]0/24 network range, signals a path to uncover further significant affiliations.
Transitioning from this discovery, we shift our focus to the “Informed Mama” brand, frequently linked with Denise Aguilar, a Californian person with felony convictions and gang member. An intriguing connection can be traced from Aguilar’s alternate domain, theinformedmama[.]org, to the same 50.63.202[.]0/24 network. Notice the fist logo used in her product branding.
Moving on to a noteworthy event on June 22, 2019, Aguilar was spotted alongside a woman wearing a “Freedom Keeper” t-shirt and well-known Scientologist, Michelle Ford. This occurrence may appear coincidental, but Aguilar’s prior coordination of a protest for Del Bigtree adds a layer of complexity, urging us to probe deeper.
In this light, it’s vital to bear in mind Del Bigtree’s intimate connections to Scientology and the Nation of Islam.
#InVinoVeritas
#OperationHoneyHost
Denise Irene Aguilar Mendez, also known as “Denise Marie,” has felony convictions and is a reputed gang member in California. However, her association with Scientology and involvement with multiple charities raises questions about her rehabilitation through the Criminon program.
She has been found guilty of fraud among other serious charges.
Her association with Scientology, however, merits further investigation. It raises questions about how, similarly to Erin Olszewski, she was able to establish multiple charities while journeying across the United States.
One notable observation is the prominence of three women in her life, all of whom are reputed Scientologists and with whom she is frequently photographed.
It begs the question: Was “Denise Marie” rehabilitated through the Criminon program, a known initiative of Scientology?
#InVinoVeritas
#OperationFuriosa
Copyright © 2024 by Greg Wyatt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |